Fair Access to Publicly Funded Research Results

The EFF {Electronic Frontier Foundation} has an initiative to get public access to publically funded research.
I have mixed feeling on this issue.
On the one hand we as taxpayers have paid for this research to be funded and should have a right to read the research. We shouldn’t have to subscribe to extremely expensive research data stores that charge for access to the research, like we currently do. Not having to wait for the peer review journal process to publish research will mean faster and more current research availability. On that I agree.

BUT, much government funded research produces garbage because it was poorly executed, conceived or done with an agenda that is contrary to public good and truthfulness. Many people won’t be able to grasp how the data was analyzed as rarely is this disclosed fully in the research. The best system we currently have is the Academic or Peer Journal review process. This Peer review/rewrite process can be a multi-year process where the research results value diminishes on time critical research. But the value of Peers reviewing the research can save many from acting on research results of a bad piece of research.

Refer to the economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff article about “austerity” …”has shaped political decisions over the best way to deal with foundering economies.” Many governments have based financial strategies on this NON-Peer reviewed paper and less than 3 years after publication a Graduate student at Univ.of Mass. found math errors and omissions that some have said “the Reinhart/Rogoff claim was ideology, not social science.” [ibid]

Care should be taken when reviewing Research and Statistical Analysis. NEVER look at research as if it is a sound bite by a politician.
Still I think the public may have challenged the research quicker if there was government laws requiring disclosure.
To be fair to Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, they not only released their research to the doctoral student Thomas Herndon, he said on The Colbert Report talk show recently they also sent him the original spreadsheets that they had used in the calculations and it was on page one near the top where Thomas Herndon found the math error. Proof of the value of Peer Review.

I include below the text of the message that is sent to your representaives in Washington.:
As your constituent, I am urging you to support the Fair Access to Science & Technology Research Act (FASTR is S. 350 in the
Senate and H.R. 708 in the House).

Government agencies like the National Science Foundation invest millions of taxpayer dollars into scientific research every year, but the resulting research is locked up in expensive journals. As a result students and citizens have difficulty accessing information they need; professors have a harder time reviewing and teaching the state of the art; and cutting-edge research remains hidden.

FASTR fixes this. The bill makes government agencies design and implement a plan to facilitate public access to the results of their investments. Any researcher who receives federal funding must submit a copy of resulting journal articles to the funding agency, which will then make that research widely available within six months.

Please secure our rights as taxpayers and promote the progress of science by supporting FASTR.

If YOU would like to let your Representative in Washington D.C. know you support passage of this Bill you can have a email sent to your representatives by going to this web address. Tell my representative I want Publically Funded Research Available to the Public. Just enter in your zip codein the box on the right side, it will look up who your representatives are and send to them.

For California there is additional Initiative you can Let your representatives know by clicking Here to let california representatives Know I want state funded research to be available to the public

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>